GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/128426/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 128426,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/128426/?format=api",
"text_counter": 266,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 166,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
"slug": "martha-karua"
},
"content": "On Cap.2 Section 51, it is quite clear that where the Statute does not provide for reappointment, you must follow the same process you followed for appointing. It, therefore, goes without saying that if to appoint the Director the President had to receive the recommendation from the Advisory Board and then come to Parliament for approval, the reappointment is exactly the same mode. Common sense also dictates that when you reappoint, you appraise the performance. The President cannot appraise the performance because it is appraised by the Advisory Board and then Parliament endorses. I am just wondering; why this desperation for shortcuts?"
}