Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1285407,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1285407/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 756,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Funyula, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr) Ojiambo Oundo",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": " I am looking at sub-clause 2(vi) which states thus: (vi) by deleting the paragraph (i) and substituting therefor the following new paragraph― (i) in collaboration with county governments, implement an equitable mechanism for the pricing of sugar crop and appropriation of proceeds from the disposal of the by-products of sugar production between millers and growers as stipulated in the guidelines. It is about deleting Paragraph (i) and substituting therefore the new paragraph. The import and the long-term effect of that particular amendment is that after the Sugar- cane Pricing Committee as provided for in the Third Schedule, Part III has made its own decision or determination, the Board is obligated to, again, go and consult the county governments for any further action after that. The question which he needs to explain is this: After the Sugar-cane Pricing Committee has set the pricing, will the Board be required to go and consult the county governments before they make the final decision? That is what he needs to clarify so that it is very clear to all the farmers."
}