GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1299528/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1299528,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1299528/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 349,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Osotsi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13588,
        "legal_name": "Osotsi Godfrey Otieno",
        "slug": "osotsi-godfrey-otieno"
    },
    "content": "Madam Temporary Speaker, I am rising under Standing Order No.105 which my good friend Sen. Cherarkey has misused in this House. It is important for me to rise on this because we are degenerating as a House. When you are discussing a matter, it has become the norm that the easiest way of curtailing debate is to rise under Standing Order No.105. Sometimes back, about a week ago, when we were discussing a similar Motion of Adjournment with regard to tribal clashes in Sondu, Sen. Cherarkey demanded that I substantiate the sentiments I had expressed that there was some fighting near the border of Nandi and Vihiga County. Madam Temporary Speaker, this is now the second week and I have been waiting for the Chair to ask me to substantiate. I have never been asked to come and substantiate. I was told to come and substantiate, but nothing happened the next Tuesday. My point of order is this: The Chair of this House must observe any incidents of misuse of Standing Order No.105, which many Senators here, especially Sen. Cherarkey are used to bringing up. I decided to bring it up when he was speaking to inform the House that I have been waiting to substantiate the claims I made and the Chair has never asked me to substantiate. Is it in order for Standing Order No.105 to be misused in this House as a way of curtailing democracy, debate and free speech?"
}