Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 129983,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/129983/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 371,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Minister for Finance and this side, it would be expeditious to save both on the expenses of the House and the nation to reduce the debate time to five days. It would be in the interest of the nation and the House. I do not think any Member on the opposite Bench has made any convincing argument that extending the debate to seven days is any meritorious. I think the gist of the matter is not to say that we should not reduce it to five when the point that we are making is to expedite the debate to make it more efficient. Indeed, I am convinced that were the House to meet as we have been meeting during the debating of the Ministries, to nine o’clock, we might, indeed, do this thing even in two days. I think it is upon the House to convince the nation that we can use our time much more efficiently by extending the debate and debating in a much shorter time rather than by lengthening it. Lengthening unnecessarily can make us stand accused that we are using our time inefficiently. So, I think the opposite side has the responsibility to convince the nation that, indeed, extending the debate to seven will be more efficient than doing it in five days. So, I would like to appeal to the opposite side that they should listen to arguments and not be too anxious to interrupt without any reason. With those few remarks, I beg to support."
}