Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1306044,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1306044/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 648,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Veronica Maina",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Rule 37(c), I think you know where it is, talks about the respondents not having the audience of the courts until the contempt is purged. The witness has confirmed that he is now being paid and that they have been reinstated. I hope that is the correct position. Counsel, do you treat that as a purge to that contempt, now that those offenses are no longer taking place and they have been reinstated? Additionally, I know that the sentencing is awaiting before the court. If the sentencing is awaiting, would you still say the matter is not pending before court?"
}