Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1336147,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1336147/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 304,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Ruaraka, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. TJ Kajwang’",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Chairlady, what is out of order is how we are following our Standing Orders. We are in a conundrum. Hon. Otiende Amollo has moved a proposed further amendment. He had already written a letter and you have it. So, his amendment is correct. Hon. Kaluma has also an amendment. He has written a letter and you are with it, whether it is a deletion or not. If you go to the Standing Orders, the priority one must follow, in my view, is that you start with what is top in the hierarchy of those amendments. So, if we start with Hon. Otiende’s, thereafter, it should be as further amended by Hon. Kaluma because Hon. Kaluma’s intends to delete the whole clause. So, he can be heard on any of those sections that we are talking about, just in case he wrote his letter to the Speaker, which he has confirmed that he did. What has not been said here is, if we say that Members of Parliament and MCAs should not do or do something, it is also discriminatory. Why are you choosing Members of Parliament? Why are you not talking about cabinet secretaries? It is discriminatory. The law itself is unconstitutional because it is discriminatory. You are picking on specific people and you are choosing on them. Hon. Baya, why do you want to legislate against yourself? Why on earth do you want to legislate against yourself on something that is discriminatory?"
}