GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1339473/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1339473,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1339473/?format=api",
"text_counter": 714,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Kikuyu, UDA",
"speaker_title": "Hon. Kimani Ichung’wah",
"speaker": null,
"content": " Yes. If you go to the Bill, Page 1539, we are substituting just the word 'who' with that clause 'if the person offering, promising or giving'. The term 'knows' is still in the Bill. It is still there. It is retained. The amendment, as has been moved by the Chairperson is quite in order. It will read that \"a person commits the offense of giving a bribe if the person offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person.\" instead of 'who knows'. You remove 'who' and it will read: 'If the person offering, promising or giving knows or believes the acceptance of the financial or other advantage would itself constitute the improper performance of the relevant function or activity'. Therefore, Hon. Kaluma's fears are well addressed."
}