Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1340138,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1340138/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 431,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Funyula, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon (Dr) Ojiambo Oundo",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Chairlady, the amendment to subclause (3)(d) deals with auctioning of properties of a rateable owner who has defaulted to pay the rates. All I am doing is to make it very clear that when you auction the property, you must do it at a certain threshold, which is contained under Sections 96 and Section 97 of the Land Act. However, they only relate to cases where a borrower has defaulted to pay. Since we have set the standard, I want to convince my colleagues that this is a neater way of doing it. If we subject it to auction, let the reserve price be the one contemplated in the Land Act. That is the neater way to do it."
}