Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1366844,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1366844/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 3016,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Dr. Muthomi Thiankolu",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Sen. Methu, it is true that we have adduced evidence to support the allegation that we sought information on the IFMIS extracts from the CECM, which is on page 30 of our volume two. This was done via a letter from the clerk. The response from the CECM is on Page 31 of our volume two, where the CECM declined. The question asked is whether we have done anything to the CECM. We decided to hit the nail on the head because these are monies expended in the office of the Governor. Furthermore, the County Government Act holds the governor culpable for the management of the resources of the county. Number two on if the work tickets are not forged. I am guided that it is County Government’s Act Section 30(3)(f) – “In performing the functions under Sub-Section 2 the Governor will be accountable for the management and use of the county resources.” Furthermore, the CECM for Finance is an appointee of the Governor. It is also not true that the work tickets are forged. There is no way you can use the same work ticket with the same serial number for January, March and April. This would be irregular."
}