Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1367113,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1367113/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 3285,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Orwoba",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "and other terminologies that sound abrasive, harsh and insensitive. How are those grounds for impeachment? If they can tie them to either committing a crime, abuse of office or physical or mental incapacitation. Secondly, I pose this to both parties. We have a lot of evidence that has been submitted here in terms of exhibits in support of the impeachment Motion, and they are quoting social media; WhatsApp messages, Facebook and the likes. My question is, has this evidence actually passed through the legal process of authentication legally known as the chain of custody? We need to be sure that what we are referencing is legitimate evidence. Is it possible to get the context of these screenshots because we are in the era where there is a lot of misleading? Can we get the context instead of just giving us part screenshots of the message? Finally, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Did they get consent for any social media exhibits that have been posted here? As you know, for instance in WhatsApp, the data manger is the administrator. Did you get consent to be able to post these alleged exhibits to ---"
}