Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1397035,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1397035/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 392,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Ruaraka, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. TJ Kajwang’",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "wounds. People who die of bullet wounds are what a human being can see. Three people died because of bullet wounds and two others were maimed yet in the response by the Cabinet Secretary, he gives a statement which I found very worrisome. He says that no live ammunition was used. Those two statements are irreconcilable. One says three Kenyans died yet a Cabinet Secretary says there was no live bullet used. When a Cabinet Secretary makes a statement which is untruthful on a matter of fact, should the House not reprimand them if it turns out that this is untrue? And should the Cabinet Secretary be ordered to give a further statement on the accuracy, if only on the use of firearms? I take the Member very seriously because Members do not lie in this House. When a Member says three people are dead because of bullet wounds, it is true. We take an oath here to defend the Constitution and be truthful to this House. I tend to think that Hon. Janet is telling the truth on this matter. When the Cabinet Secretary says there was no firearm used, should we not ask the Cabinet Secretary to make further statements on that issue so that we get the truth of this matter?"
}