GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1444322/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1444322,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1444322/?format=api",
"text_counter": 132,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "The Senate Majority Leader (",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Bill whether that child will be counted among the other three or it is a complete separate home, given the fact that this is dividing the intestate into two; between the surviving spouse and this other child. Sen. Veronica Maina, that means two different things, and you may want to provide clarity to that. If for arguments sake, a deceased person had three sons, and their intestate is being divided among them, a simple calculation is that, if another son was to show up, by dint of practise of a law as you are proposing it, then the division will now be in two. The mother and her sons and this other son that has showed up being treated as another family, as opposed to being put together with the other three sons. You need to provide clarity, unless I have not read quite properly. It is something that I need to understand. I repeat for emphasis sake that this is in public interest. I have no other interest in this. Clause 1(b) is speaking of where there are surviving children, which includes a child who is not a child of the surviving spouse. What are their entitlements? It States that-"
}