GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1451228/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1451228,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1451228/?format=api",
"text_counter": 75,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Sen. Wambua",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 13199,
"legal_name": "Enoch Kiio Wambua",
"slug": "enoch-kiio-wambua"
},
"content": "Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Where I sit, this is also a very serious issue. It is serious because I do understand that the Committee had already tabled its report and that the moving of the Motion was subsequent to a report. If that letter is admissible, although I have not seen the letter, then it would follow that the Committee made a decision on account of misleading information. The source of the misleading information has attempted to correct that position. Nevertheless, from our traditions, customs and practices, once a committee tables a report, I do not know what avenue is available to reopen the report. The only window that I see is in the Motion. Sen. Mungatana is proposing something, and I do not know how possible that is in the immediate, that Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale can move the Motion in an amended version. My understanding of the practices is that the decision to amend the Motion cannot be made on the Floor; it has to be a Committee decision with guidance from the Speaker. I am not helping the situation in any way, I am also getting confused about it, but your reasoned ruling is needed on this. Perhaps, you give us a date that you are going to rule on this after determining the authenticity of the letter that has come. You can do a reasoned ruling and guide the House on how to process this matter. I submit."
}