GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1457682/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1457682,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1457682/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 132,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Cherarkey",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13217,
        "legal_name": "Cherarkey K Samson",
        "slug": "cherarkey-k-samson"
    },
    "content": "In the community where I come from, when you are married, you belong to that family. However, with the changes in the law, you can be married to another family, but when the succession of family land happens, you include the daughters. I think that was a critical decision that the Kericho High Court made. However, in the interest of the principle of issues of succession, including tradition, religious and personal law, when you are married, you are supposed to belong to the husband. This should also include the chattels, the property, and the land. Why would you want to still come and claim in your father's house when the bride price has been paid? That is the conversation---"
}