Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1478434,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1478434/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 84,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Olekina",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 407,
        "legal_name": "Ledama Olekina",
        "slug": "ledama-olekina"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Let me appreciate the Cabinet Secretary for the National Treasury and Economic Planning. I just noted that he has lost a lot of weight. I am offering to give him a goat, so that he can gain it a little bit. Mr. Speaker, Sir, I thank him for coming and responding to this matter. Sen. Sifuna has asked a very important question. I used to sit in the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). This issue came up for discussion when the Auditor General had raised the concern that the Government may not have full control of the e-Citizen platform. I have listened to the response given by the Cabinet Secretary and I want some further clarification on a few issues. Number one, does the Government have control of this e-Citizen platform? The Cabinet Secretary has also alluded to the fact that the Kshs50 is paid to - and I believe it is paid to the creator of e-Citizen. I think his name is James Ayugi, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Webmaster. This amount of Kshs50 that you have now sort of like scaled it based on the amount of money, which is paid to the Government; is this system going to be leased forever, or was it developed in a BOT kind of method, where after some time it is transferred to the Government? If this e-Citizen platform is managed by the ICT Authority, but it is being leased from Webmaster, at what point is the Government of Kenya will have full control of it? Finally, still on that question---"
}