Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 148920,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/148920/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 186,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 166,
        "legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
        "slug": "martha-karua"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is becoming usual with the Government these days; “this answer is incomplete”. If you look at part “c” of my Question, I had asked what became of the National task Force on Police Reforms launched by the Ministry in 2004; who were its members and their qualifications. So, we have not been told who the Members of the 2004 task Force were and their qualifications. Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, let the Assistant Minister give us that. But before he does so, I have noted from his answer that the highest ranking official of the current task Force is a retired Judge of the High Court whereas Justice Waki is a Judge of the Court of Appeal. The Waki Tribunal of Inquiry also had a very senior retired police officer from New Zealand. By comparison, the Waki Tribunal had better qualified people to evaluate police reforms than the current task force. So, could he tell us why the Government is engaging in a money-wasting exercise for a lesser or inferior task force to evaluate the work of a superior task force? If it is the making of a matrix, I was the Minister in charge of these reforms and the mediation committee and we had drawn a matrix which had been submitted to the Cabinet. So, what matrix are they going to prepare or is this just a cover-up to stall the reforms?"
}