Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1491414,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1491414/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 185,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Olekina",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 407,
        "legal_name": "Ledama Olekina",
        "slug": "ledama-olekina"
    },
    "content": "Then your proposition is justified. However, of course, those who are spending do not want to be called to account to it. So, I beseech you to remove this hindrance. There is no point of the Assembly depending on the Executive. The PFM Act as it stands right now, puts the County Treasurer as the CECM, Finance and Economic Planning. He is the sole County Treasurer. However, now that we are introducing this provision and we are giving the Clerk of the County Assembly the powers to administer these funds, why then should we not give him almost similar powers as the powers that the CECM Finance and Economic Planning has as the head of that treasury? Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like you to relook at section 109(e). Let us ensure that we make these amendments during the Committee of the Whole. If you leave this, you will not have solved the problem. You have attempted to solve the problem by 109(e)(ii) when you say-"
}