GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/149899/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 149899,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/149899/?format=api",
"text_counter": 54,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "June 3, 2009 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 1019 Mr. Imanyara",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, I clearly sympathize with the people of Rarieda because it appears they have been targeted for political reasons. However, my concern is that the Assistant Minister himself says that the letter of appointment in Article 4, required appraisal and review from time to time. This is a condition of the contract. Before a contract can be terminated, at the very least, he should say they did review and appraise the contract on particular dates; once, twice or thrice. As a result of being dissatisfied, they took this action. The Assistant Minister says that he does not have that information. Is it not proper that the Assistant Minister goes and does proper homework? We are talking about serious allegations leveled against him. I have seen that letter and the language used in the letter is not the normal language that is used in dismissing civil servants. The Assistant Minister should come to the House with an answer that is satisfactory not only to the House but also to the particular individuals who have been targeted."
}