Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1503285,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1503285/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 525,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Peter Kaluma",
    "speaker_title": "The Temporary Speaker",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1565,
        "legal_name": "George Peter Opondo Kaluma",
        "slug": "george-peter-opondo-kaluma"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Timothy, your time will be held. I will add you time because you note that the matters you are talking to as a lawyer are very serious. Hon. Kimani Kuria is taking them seriously. This is a matter of procurement or asset disposal. I think there was a good reason we were telling judicial review courts, which are application-based courts, to seek leave. Leave may operate as a stay or not. Then, they would go to substantive motions and determination. Because of the expediency with which we want judicial review applications to be dealt with, the law as it is limits hearing and determination time to 45 days. That is so that whatever the reason you are procuring can move forward. In that context, how do you support the removal of that and leaving it open to court? Without the time limitations we put for determination of things like election petitions, you know judicial review actions can stay in courts for eternity. With the progressive debate you are making, I was thinking you were going to reject that amendment."
}