Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1505260,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1505260/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1171,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "No. Type of Licence/ Permit or Issuing Authority Certificate 18. Coffee Marketing Agents Capital Markets Authority License 19. Trading License” Capital Markets Authority Hon. Temporary Chairlady, after a lot of debate at the Committee level, we realised that some of the licenses, permits and certificates need to be done in consultation. We, therefore, bestowed the responsibility of issuing to certain institutions but in due consultation with others. This is the case in warehouse licensing. The warehouse is where you keep green coffee or parchment coffee; and we had proposed that instead of the county governments doing this, for purposes of the Board being sure that this coffee is really the grade that they would like to see and for the conditions to remain optimal, it is the Board that should issue that license in consultation with the county government. When it comes to coffee nursery certificates, we would like the Board to be in-charge of the material that farmers plant because it is the regulatory body. So, we agreed that the Board issues the licenses in consultation with the county government because it will be produced at the county level. On pulping station for the purposes of keeping the standards, we propose the same. There is confusion there. Pulping license is left to the county government in consultation with the Board. The second last is that the Coffee Marketing Agent License should be issued by the Capital Markets Authority while the Trading License should be issued by the Capital Markets Authority as opposed to the provisions as they are now whereby, those licenses are supposed to be issued by the Board."
}