GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1506176/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1506176,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1506176/?format=api",
"text_counter": 502,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Seme, ODM",
"speaker_title": "Hon. James Nyikal",
"speaker": null,
"content": " Thank you for giving me opportunity. Although it is a simple amendment Bill, it strides very many major principles. I am not sure about the law you are referring. I guess it is school entry age and the Education Act. You refer to the definition of childhood age and when one becomes an adult to get an identity card. It shows that we do not harmonise many of our laws. We have a law in an area conflicting with another law. This is another example where we put a law that conflicted with the law of when people should get identity cards. We should start thinking whether the definition of childhood and getting an identity card is an area that we should look at if it generates problems such as these. Having said that, this is actually a problem in the education sector. As we now know, it is faced with a myriad of problems like policy issues that we cannot harmonise to operate properly. Our education system has problems funding university education. Again, this is a smaller bit of the bigger problem of funding university education. The main issue with funding university education is just proxy means testing. It is as simple as that. People are now saying that they want to change band five and abolish band four and five. We need to find out how we got bands four and five. The proxy means testing would help if it was done properly. Even when we help children via the Bill we are discussing, they"
}