Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1507657,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1507657/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 412,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Aldai, UDA",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Marianne Kitany",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": " If you look at the current co-operatives, you will find instances where individuals register co-operatives for dishonest purposes, such as in cases like the Ekeza Sacco, where people lost money. Those co-operatives are registered with the sole purpose of conning the common man. Therefore, if a co-operative already exists and is serving the same purpose, there is no need to register another co-operative to do the same In my constituency, for example, we grow tea. Therefore, if there is already a co- operative that is focused on tea growing, there is no need to register another tea-growing co- operative with the same membership. That would mean that the other co-operative would exist for the purposes of conning members. That is why we are saying that in scenarios where a co- operative already exists, the commissioner will step in to investigate why there is an attempt to"
}