Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1527740,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1527740/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 144,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Methu",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13581,
        "legal_name": "Methu John Muhia",
        "slug": "methu-john-muhia"
    },
    "content": "be used to draw money from the consolidated fund and confuse the Controller of Budget if we do not resource this office so that we can get a system that the Controller of Budget can trace this money. That the money went straight to the County Revenue Fund, and that money was used for the specific reason why the money was requested, or the requisition was made for. Maybe you may know or not that the way our Constitution has been made, we are not deficient in the rules that we have. One of the requirements that we have is that the development budget for every county or even the national Government, must be at least 30 per cent of the entire budget. People will make a requisition and say that they are using the money for development. Once that money hits the County Revenue Fund, it is voided and used for recurrent expenditure. We cannot stop this vice unless the Controller of Budget has a view of how this money is moving from the Consolidated Fund to the County Revenue Fund to the specific account of requisition. If it is X who requested it, that money must end up there. I do not want to buttress that point, but it is extremely important. I have seen a proposal to add some money to the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA). More specifically, I have seen that they want to try to develop a formula and a system that will help---"
}