GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1556289/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1556289,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1556289/?format=api",
"text_counter": 231,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Sen. Cherarkey",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Mr. Temporary Speaker, Sir, just for clarity, I agree with Sen. Sifuna. The interpretation of the words ‘Bill’ and ‘Motion’ are two things that are totally different, even how you prosecute and time allocated. The question should be that the Motion and Bill are two different aspects that are of the same family, but different species as a Biology class would describe. So the reading of this is that Sen. Gloria has a right, but Standing Order No.97(3) qualifies this by saying it is a Motion. Does it mean the Motion and the Bill are the same? If it is the same, then Sen. Orwoba has the right to donate part of her reply. However, if it is not the same, then the right to reply should be in the terms of the Bill. If so, Sen. Orwoba should reply or request, as per Standing Order No.63 or 66, that the putting of the question be deferred or the division be deferred, if it concerns counties. So, clarity on that will assist some of us. That also includes Sen. Sifuna, who is on the queue to move the Sports (Amendment) Bill of 2024. I thank you, and I submit."
}