Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1585419,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1585419/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 919,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "- Member (e) Mr Mohamed Sheikh Noor - Member What is the purpose of the National Assembly approving these tribunals? Is there room for rejection? What would be the grounds for rejection? I will leave that for now. We have tabled an elaborate Report that covers all the hearings of the five nominees. I urge Members who have not read it to do so, so that we do not spend a lot of time on it. The first nominee was Ms Eunice Adoyo Otieno Arwa, aged 52, who is proposed to be the Chairperson of the Tribunal. She is a seasoned advocate who satisfied all the constitutional requirements in terms of her ability to serve as the chairperson. She has served in several other similar tribunals. Those were positive attributes that qualified Ms Otieno Arwa to serve as the chairperson for the appointed period. The second nominee to be vetted was Ms Christabel Mideva Eboso, a young lady of 32 years. She is the Generation Z (Gen Z) representative, and it is good to speak positively about her. She is an advocate of the High Court of Kenya, and has practised law for quite a while. She has also been involved in various tribunal matters, which gives her the necessary experience and qualifications to serve on this Tribunal. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}