Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 166429,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/166429/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 220,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Mungatana",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 185,
        "legal_name": "Danson Buya Mungatana",
        "slug": "danson-mungatana"
    },
    "content": "Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker, I also want to take issue with Clause 28. I am wondering how you would charge these expenses directly to the Consolidated Fund from an Act of Parliament without further appropriations. We know that it is those constitutional commissions that have that kind of privilege. You cannot say that every commission or board that we set up will be a charge to the Consolidated Fund. How do we organize finances? I think we should be predictable. We know that the Judiciary itself will be charging directly. We also know that Parliament itself will be charging directly. But why should a board charge directly the Consolidated Fund? I think this can be done either through the Vote of the Judiciary itself or the Ministry can find a way. I think this is elevating this Board to a dangerous status. It cannot enjoy a constitutional level kind of thing."
}