Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 182569,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/182569/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 399,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Abdikadir",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1,
        "legal_name": "Abdikadir Hussein Mohamed",
        "slug": "abdikadir-mohammed"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 25 of the Bill be amended- (a) in Subclause (4) by deleting paragraph (c) and the proviso thereof; (b) by inserting the following new subclauses immediately after Subclause (4)- (4A) A person who disobeys any direction of the Commission under Subsection (4) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment to a term of not more than two years or a fine of not more than two hundred thousand shillings or both. (4B) The Commission may give such directions in respect of the record of proceedings as may be necessary to protect the identity of any witness before it. Mr. Chairman, Sir, Subclause 4(c) does not fit in well with the other subclauses. If you look at Clause 25(4)(1) where the Commission directs the public, or any part thereof, shall not be present at any proceedings or part of the commission--- Part (c) says \"that such directions will be given in respect of the record of proceedings as may be necessary to protect---\" It does not fit in well. The second issue is that we were providing a penalty so that it becomes a stronger clause."
}