GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/187294/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 187294,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/187294/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 260,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Prof. Kamar",
    "speaker_title": "The Temporary Deputy Speaker",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 33,
        "legal_name": "Margaret Jepkoech Kamar",
        "slug": "margaret-kamar"
    },
    "content": " She does not want it to be withdrawn, but to be postponed according to Standing Order No.21. If the Mover wishes to use Standing Order No.21 which reads and I agree:- 2204 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES July 30, 2008 \"(1) A Member who wishes to postpone to some future occasion the further discussion of a question which has been proposed from the Chair may claim to move \"That the debate be now adjourned\", or, in Committee of the Whole House \"That, the Chairman do report progress\". So that we resume the debate itself. Sub-section 2 says:- \"(2) The debate on any such Motion shall be confined to the matter of the Motion.\" \"(3) If Mr. Speaker shall be of the opinion that any such dilatory Motion is an abuse of the proceedings of the House, he may forthwith put the question thereon or he may decline to propose it.\" I think what hon. Members are asking for is whether we can allow the postponement of this debate, rather than adjourn it and come back to debate it again."
}