Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 199895,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/199895/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 422,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Ms. Ndung'u",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 361,
        "legal_name": "Susanna Njoki Ndung'u",
        "slug": "njoki-ndungu"
    },
    "content": "No, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. Let me read Clause 29(2) again. It says:- \"An employer who has paid a female employee wages for two months during her maternity, shall be reimbursed by the NSSF.\" That is what I am saying should be deleted. It does not even make any sense. Procreation is also part of the economic growth and I think that private companies should not demand from the Government what should be their corporate and social responsibility; which is to pay women for maternity leave. Finally, I propose to insert a new Sub-clause 29(9) that a male employee should be entitled to two weeks paternity leave with full pay. This is to help young fathers because young men still take leave in order to help their wives and take care of their young families, but they do this from their annual leave. Why should they do this? Let the men also get leave for this particular special circumstance. I beg to move."
}