Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 201286,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/201286/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 322,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Wako",
    "speaker_title": "The Attorney-General",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 208,
        "legal_name": "Sylvester Wakoli Bifwoli",
        "slug": "wakoli-bifwoli"
    },
    "content": " Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I oppose this amendment. This is for reasons that were stated when we were opposing Section 27. But also the fact that the initial application is ex parte . This is for a purpose. If you remove the ex parte position and substitute therefor it will give the parties notice. In these days, whatever records are there, can disappear within an hour. So, it is ex parte, so that, at least, the court can make an order of preservation. However, it does not stop the person against whom that ex parte is given from challenging that particular order, if, indeed, he has reasonable ground to challenge it. I am opposed to the amendment."
}