GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/210437/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 210437,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/210437/?format=api",
"text_counter": 341,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Muturi",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 215,
"legal_name": "Justin Bedan Njoka Muturi",
"slug": "justin-muturi"
},
"content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, if that is correct, then just below there, they should have put Appropriations-in-Aid, that is, on the expenditure side. Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, for the umpteenth time, I want to say that it is not right to be given these explanations. Every Minister seems to be telling us the same thing, that there is an \"s\" missing. The next Item is \"Refurbishment of Buildings.\" This Item runs through all the Ministries. I think the House now needs to take on all the Ministers on this issue. There is something that the technocrats, either through the Treasury or the Ministries, are not telling the House truthfully and are just telling Ministers to come and confuse the House. With regard to \"Refurbishment of Buildings\" and \"Construction of Building\", it cannot be that they missed putting 3012 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES August 7, 2007 an \"s\". It is not so! Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, in all the Ministries that we have covered here, if you go through these Printed Estimates, especially under the Development Expenditure, you will realise that there is an Item called \"Construction of Building\". The explanation we get for this particular Item is that it is only an \"s\" which is missing. When it comes to refurbishment, the Item is \"Refurbishment of Buildings\". That is not true! With regard to rural health centres and dispensaries, nobody in their right mind would think that it is only an \"s\" which is missing. Maybe, the Minister could actually get a better a clarification. Either it has got to do with the coding or something like that from the Treasury. They should correct it because it is causing a lot of anxiety in the House."
}