GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/240453/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 240453,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/240453/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 214,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, you are aware that we are trying to get rid of few selected firms from quoting for this commodity. But these firms are the same ones who are allowed to bring sugar. When you look at the whole Report, the other parts are not badly written. But when you get into the details of the Report, you will never find any name mentioned in relation to corruption. So, why should the Minister be vilified? Is it because he is trying to help farmers to improve the sugar industry? Why? Why can the Report not tell us? The interpretation of the law is what is now coming out clearly. You know, \"shall\" and \"will\" are different words. Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move:- THAT, Part Two of the PIC Report contained from pages 8 to 35 and any other related sections or any reference to Part Two, be deleted. I am suggesting this because this Report has no reference to the Controller and Auditor- General's reports. So, I think there is a problem here. Let us call a spade a spade. Where is it mentioned by the Controller and Auditor-General that the Minister or the sugar board chief did this or that? With those remarks, I beg to move, and ask hon. Ochilo-Ayacko to second."
}