GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/245194/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 245194,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/245194/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 109,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Order! I think, sometimes, we forget the rules of the House alltogether! Completely! I think every hon. Member in this House knows, or ought to know that, there is a Standing Order that bars hon. Members from saying anything about a misconduct of an hon. Member, without bringing a Substantive Motion. There is nothing as bad as calling a colleague corrupt, or saying he has corrupt intentions. If you are going to assault the character of your colleague in that fashion, the right thing to do is to bring a Motion calling into question the conduct of that hon. Member. I will not allow, under any circumstance, hon. Members assaulting the characters or conduct of others! They should do it through a Substantive Motion as provided for by the rules of the House. They should not do it during Question Time. It makes utter nonsense of the provisions of that Standing Order. That Standing Order was put there to protect hon. Members against mud-slinging! We must protect that at all times. Secondly, Mr. Deputy Speaker was sitting here. I have looked at the HANSARD. He called upon the hon. Member to substantiate there and then. The hon. Member was not able to substantiate then. He sought to be given time to do that. Mr. Deputy Speaker declined and made a ruling on it. When the hon. Member was unable to substantiate, as directed by the Chair, he was ordered out of the House under Standing Order No.88. That concludes the matter! The Chair has already made a definitive ruling on the matter and the hon. Member, having failed to comply, was punished. I cannot punish him again! I cannot revive the matter. That is the end of the story!"
}