GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/249103/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 249103,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/249103/?format=api",
"text_counter": 392,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
"speaker_title": "The Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs",
"speaker": {
"id": 166,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
"slug": "martha-karua"
},
"content": " Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, to conclude my argument, Clause 28(1) is very specific. It is directed at the actual offender, and it does not talk of burden of proof. This means the normal thing in our criminal law applies; he who asserts must prove. So, until it is proved that you have administered, there is no way you then can be defending yourself that you did not have an intention to commit a sexual offence. I am, therefore, proposing to Members to reject the amendment and let the Bill go through as it is."
}