GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/249149/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 249149,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/249149/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 438,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mrs. Mugo",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 85,
        "legal_name": "Beth Wambui Mugo",
        "slug": "beth-mugo"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I rise to very strongly, oppose the amendment. A lot of the rape incidents we have read about in the Press involve school girls who are raped in hotel rooms or in public places. The girls are lured into hotel premises by grown up men; that they are going to be bought lunch or other gifts. At the end of the day, they are raped. When the hotel managers give keys to these so-called \"men\", they can see that whoever is being led into that hotel room is a child. Instead of supporting that child and saying \"no\", they settle for that quick money. They are more concerned with making profit than protecting the girls. If we do not just oppose this amendment for anybody else, let us do it for the sake of innocent children who are being sexually assaulted day in, day out. Maybe, some hon. Members here think otherwise but they should realise that the victims of such crime are their daughters. They are harassed everyday. Therefore, I completely oppose the argument that hotel owners, who may be sleeping at home while a lady is being raped in their premises, will end up in jail if we adopt this clause. There are managers in hotels all the time. The managers work under the owners of the hotels. The responsibility lies with the management. I beg to oppose."
}