GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/250201/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 250201,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/250201/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 376,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
    "speaker_title": "The Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 166,
        "legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
        "slug": "martha-karua"
    },
    "content": " Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise to oppose the amendment and to support the Motion of Adjournment. I hear the hon. Members saying they are interested in coming back to work. We have been here and even the newspapers have documented the level of interest shown on a daily basis. This is the quorum watch. The question that comes to one's mind is: Is the claim that we want to work borne out genuine interest, or are there other considerations? If, indeed, we want to come back to work, this is, indeed, a very noble idea. Let the hon. Members today decide whether we go on recess and when we should come back. However, what will stand the test of time is how we utilise our time in this House. It is not the pious statements that we want to work when, indeed, we are not even available for that work. Let members of the public keep watch whether those of us shouting loudest that we want to work will be available here to do the work. We are interested in passing Bills. We, as a Government, the number of Bills---"
}