Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 262232,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/262232/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 101,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. ole Metito",
    "speaker_title": "The Assistant Minister for Regional Development Authorities",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 199,
        "legal_name": "Judah Katoo Ole-Metito",
        "slug": "judah-ole-metito"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I agree with that, but I do not agree with Section 41(3) all the way to (6) which provides that once a motion has sailed through asking the governor to dismiss a member of the executive committee, he then forms another committee to investigate. I do not think it is fair to again form a committee to investigate, like what is anticipated in Clause 3 that the County Assembly shall appoint a select committee comprising of five members to investigate the matter. You then bring that report to the County Assembly and ask it to either agree or disagree with the recommendations of that report and it is then that the motion will be upheld. These are elected County Assembly members. When they pass a vote of no confidence to any of the executive members, I think the governor is outrightly bound to dismiss that executive committee member. I would agree to an investigating committee in the county public service. However, when you talk of the executive, these are political appointees. So I believe once a motion goes through, that executive member stands dismissed. There is no need of forming another committee of the County Assembly to investigate what the County Assembly has passed."
}