GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/263117/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 263117,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/263117/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 95,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Mungatana",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 185,
        "legal_name": "Danson Buya Mungatana",
        "slug": "danson-mungatana"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I really want the Minister to follow what I am saying with your intervention. Many of the issues which will be in this forum which I propose that we collapse together will have some financial implications. So, I am wondering where the Cabinet Secretary for the Treasury and where the Cabinet Secretary, who will be in charge of Inter-Governmental discussions will be. I know when the President will be coming for this functions, he will be definitely accompanied by the Secretary of the Cabinet who is in charge of County issues. However, we must give him a formal role. We must also give a formal role to the Secretary who is in charge of the Treasury so that when the President is attending this meeting, there will be true consultations. There will be officers of the Government within the structure that we are calling the Inter-Governmental Relations Bill that will be given real functions. Therefore, when the President comes there, the Treasury Cabinet will be there, and the Secretary in charge of County is there, so that when decisions are being made there, between the Governors, President, Deputy President and that forum, then, we have officers who will implement those decisions. So, when the President says this and this will be done, there will be a Cabinet Secretary there who will go to implement those decisions. I want to propose that the Treasury Secretary and the Secretary in charge of the Counties to be given formal roles within the structure that has been proposed in this Bill."
}