GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/271905/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 271905,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/271905/?format=api",
"text_counter": 540,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Speaker",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "I do not have the capacity to determine whether or not a signature, for example, is a signature. From where I stand and from where I sit so often, I cannot determine whether or not a document is a forgery. There are other arms of the Government which can do so and if they did, then the House can be moved appropriately to deal with the document that may have been brought to the House and is a forgery. As it is now, the House is not properly moved to determine whether or not that document is a forgery. The way to do it would be, for example, by a Motion so that the House is properly seized of the matter, the House goes into it and determines it. The manner in which the House determines a matter is clear. Most of us have been here going into the fifth year and we know how the House pronounces itself on matters. The House does not necessarily pronounce itself on matters by a ruling from the Speaker, especially where facts are before the House. So, hon. Rachel Shebesh, your answer would be, to procedurally bring this matter properly before the House and let the House determine it as you will canvass it."
}