Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 273861,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/273861/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 323,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "and, therefore, insert another sentence that would read correctly or are we supposed to assume that this letter forms part of the memorandum? If so, this letter is written on the 13th of March. That is obviously out of time. According to Article 115 of the Constitution, the President is supposed to do that within 14 days. I think we can read the Constitution, I think it is Article 115. I may wish to read or I am sure you are quite conversant with it. Maybe I need not take your time. It is very clear that he should do that within 14 days. The date of 13th is beyond the 14 days. Do we then at this hour have a different memorandum before us? Has this one been amended? Does this letter, which is out of time, have the power to amend the earlier memorandum? Are we likely to receive another letter in May again saying there are other errors? I know there are a number of other errors inside here which I do not need to divulge right now. Will there be another letter next week and it will still be acceptable? Does the meaning envisaged by Article 115 of the Constitution; that it should be within 14 days meant to be respected? I seek your clarification as to whether we have an amended memorandum. I thought we would be having an amended memorandum circulated to us. I have not seen it. I have only seen a letter which I am unable to find. It uses the word “clarify”. You clarify what is not clear."
}