Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 274588,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/274588/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 182,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Dr. Kones",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 53,
        "legal_name": "Julius Kipyegon Kones",
        "slug": "julius-kones"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the gist of this Question was in the process of appointing the Director-General of NEMA. It is good that the records have now been corrected that actually nobody had asked the Question last time. It was the Assistant Minister who stood on a point of order to table the document without the Question being asked. But now that has been explained. On the ruling which was made by the Speaker on 7th March when the Question first appeared on the Order Paper, two issues had been raised. One was on the scores, and this was raised by the hon. Members. However, my main concern was on the part of the Assistant Minister’s answer which he had given us. He gave me a list of 48 applicants. When I asked him why some of the people who had applied did not attend the interview, this was his response according to the HANSARD. The Assistant Minister said that as far as he knew, everybody who had applied attended the interview. I challenged him. I mentioned one name at that time that I knew of a Prof. Koech who never attended the interview. Now I can give the Assistant Minister the other two names because I said I knew three people who never attended the interview. The other two are Dr. Kipkure and Prof. Yaban. Those people never attended the interview. Now the Assistant Minister has changed his answer to say 21 people attended the interview. So, why is the Assistant Minister giving us two versions of the answer to the same Question? Which is which? Did everybody in this list attend the interview or not?"
}