Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 278316,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/278316/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 473,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Orengo",
    "speaker_title": "The Minister for Lands",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 129,
        "legal_name": "Aggrey James Orengo",
        "slug": "james-orengo"
    },
    "content": " Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I am not sure that I am looking at the same clause. I thought the amendment was in 37(4). All that it is saying is that subject to Article 67 and it does not say of what. So, the amendment seeks to insert the words “of the Constitution”. I think that is unnecessary amendment. However, in Clause 37(2), there is no amendment. The reason for this is that under the law of contract, if my learned friend knows, it says that you cannot enforce a contract for purposes of property, particularly land unless it is in writing. This just consists of the law of contract. So, whether we leave it or not, you will still be caught up by the law of contract. It is good. I mean, we should move forward. Anything concerning something as important as land should be there in writing. This is because it is the same people who are cheated when something is not in writing. So, I think this is an important clause."
}