GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/278530/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 278530,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/278530/?format=api",
"text_counter": 687,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Orengo",
"speaker_title": "The Minister for Lands",
"speaker": {
"id": 129,
"legal_name": "Aggrey James Orengo",
"slug": "james-orengo"
},
"content": "intention which is very obvious is that the management and administration of community land or even trust land can never be done on behalf of the county government. It can also not be done for the benefit of the county governments. So, I was proposing that that entire (d) be deleted and we remain with (e) as proposed. I do now know whether I am clear. If you want further clarity, I can read what is contained in the Constitution. Article 63(1) reads that:- “Community land shall vest in and be held by communities identified on the basis of ethnicity, culture or similar community interest”."
}