GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/278597/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 278597,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/278597/?format=api",
"text_counter": 754,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 166,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
"slug": "martha-karua"
},
"content": "Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I am not clear why we should remove the word “recommend” and then substitute it with “direct.” “Direct” is mandatory. Since the Constitution has provision on how compensation should be paid, why do we want to direct? Why do we not want the aggrieved parties to be able to agitate, if the county government is not willing to pay compensation for reasons, perhaps, that the land has been acquired unlawfully? I would oppose this amendment and suggest that we retain the word “recommend” because we have due process for any other issue arising."
}