Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 28043,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/28043/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 577,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "take care of the employers who are not interested in taking care of the welfare of their workers. However, there are certain parts of the Bill that need to be looked into. For instance, the time factor within which disputes should be settled has not been catered for. They have left it open. It would be necessary that the Bill addresses the issue of the time factor. I propose that, at least, any dispute should be settled within a period of, say, three years. This Bill should also take care of the fact that most employers tend to want to encourage corruption or impunity by bribing the judges. This Bill also takes care of that because the judges, like any other judge of any other court, will be subject to vetting. The fact that they will be vetted, we believe, that we will come up with judges of moral standing and integrity. Through that, we should expect fair judgement for our workers. However, I feel that the Bill should also have addressed the kind of personnel that is going to be in charge of the courts. The experience and the qualifications required are a little too high. Instead of 15 years experience, we should come down and say five years, so that we can also take care of some of our young people who are intelligent and gifted and can serve just as well as those who have had long term service in the Judiciary. With those few remarks, I support."
}