GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/28843/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 28843,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/28843/?format=api",
"text_counter": 557,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 166,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
"slug": "martha-karua"
},
"content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I rise to support the amendment, but to express a concern that we are merely saying “officials of a party shall be authorized”. We know that there are officials who are senior and there are officials who are in the grassroots. Which officials of the party shall be authorized to sign? I feel that we should be particular and I am now challenging the Minister - because he does not need notice to move an amendment - that we should be specific and give it to the chairperson of the party, the secretary-general or the authorized signatories of the party, so that we do not just say “officials”. If we say “authorized signatories”, it means the party has minutes authorizing those people to sign. So, I am actually suggesting that we should say “authorized signatory” because in a branch, it will not be the secretary-general. It will be the chairman of the branch and the secretary. So, we should just say: “Authorized signatories of the party.”"
}