Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 296735,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/296735/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1539,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Delete The amendments are on 3678 on the Order Paper in respect of Section 28. The input of this is important because of the freedom of movement and association as enshrined in the Constitution. We have said in the Political Parties Act, for sanity of the register that will be used towards the nomination, we are saying that at least 14 days before nomination, any update to the register that is valid should be communicated to the Commission for them to determine who is in the membership list of the party and who is not. As regards Section 29, I propose the deletion of both sections 1 and 2. In cases where parties might not have candidates even at the county level or should I say in the constituency, why would it be mandatory for them to be restricted to nominate members of other political parties or even an independent candidate where a political party does not have any person to nominate in the first place? So I am proposing a deletion of Section 29(2)."
}