GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/306112/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 306112,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/306112/?format=api",
"text_counter": 198,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "“It was agreed that even when the Committee wanted to think differently, the legal opinion of the Attorney-General as the Constitutional Chief Legal Advisor is material to making a decision on the way forward, hence could not be ignored. Even though the Minister for Transport insisted on the tender award being cancelled against the advice of the Attorney-General, the Committee advised that going against the legal opinion of the Attorney-General, who is the Government Chief Legal Advisor is, in itself, unconstitutional under the new constitutional order.” Mr. Speaker, Sir, for the benefit of this House, I want to refer to Article 156 of the new Constitution which is very clear. It states:- “The Attorney-General is the Principal Legal Advisor to the Government; and, (ii) Shall represent the national Government in court or in any other legal proceedings on which the national Government is a party, other than the criminal proceedings. Most important, it says that the Attorney-General shall promote, protect and uphold the rule of law and defend the public interest.” Could the Minister clarify the following? Is he of a better legal position than the person who this House and this nation has bestowed those powers?"
}