GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/306137/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 306137,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/306137/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 223,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Mbadi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 110,
        "legal_name": "John Mbadi Ng'ong'o",
        "slug": "john-mbadi"
    },
    "content": "On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Is it in order for the Minister to evade addressing a legitimate challenge to him to explain and give us documentary evidence that the Attorney-General gave him the advice to seek advice from the PPOA? What we have are three letters from the Attorney-General with the same opinion. We have a letter which I can also table from the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC). The letter reads:- “The preliminary investigation has not returned any findings to warrant delay in implementation of the project. You may proceed with the project as planned and ensure maximum integrity during implementation phases” This is not procurement. Procurement is assumed to be completed. Could the Minister proceed---"
}