GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/315799/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 315799,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/315799/?format=api",
"text_counter": 71,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "getting justice. He was supposed to find out from the report that was tabled in this House in the Ninth Parliament as well as the Tenth Parliament whether it recommended the opening of Charterhouse Bank. He answered to the affirmative that they were not getting justice. As the Minister in charge of justice, what is he doing to make sure that the depositors of Charterhouse Bank get justice by opening the bank and stop taking Kenyans round for flimsy reasons like not having an identity card in your account opening forms? Those are the guidelines he is talking about. So, really, who is the big brother behind the closure of Charterhouse Bank? He says that the bank failed to adhere to the prudential guidelines? He should not tell the House he does not know what these guidelines are? Could he table those guidelines he is talking about? As I said, I am an interested party because I have a deposit in that bank and I am suffering. If I am suffering, what is happening to Wanjiku?"
}